Skip to content

OnLocation

As OnLocation grows, your ideas can help shape what new features and enhancements our product team develops.

UserVoice connects you with our product team. Add new ideas, and browse, comment and vote on existing ideas.

Before adding an idea, search the existing ideas to see if it has already been raised. If it has, please vote and add a comment.
If you have an issue using OnLocation or have a question, please contact our support team


OnLocation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

174 results found

  1. Currently the only way to build a watchlist is manually, if you have thousands of contractors this is not possible. Can we have one of the following?

    1/ OnLocation creates the ability for automatically adding contractors to a watch list once the contractor is created.

    2/ OnLocation makes available Watchlists through the API - This would allow customers to build a simple automation to add contractors to the watchlist as they are added as a member.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. The ability to configure our own dashboards so that it shows one screen that displays everyone on site without the dashboard scrolling at all, and ability to configure it so that we can show the information we want.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When a SOS alert is activated and lets say we have 3 set responders it would be good to see that someone has responded so the other 2 don't keep trying to reach out and that a responder is then allocated that Alert and can deactivate it.
    At the moment you have no record or who responded to the alert at all.
    Would also be good to see communication within an app between SOS alert activator and responders - similar to what is available within the OnEvac App

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Mobile Apps  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for your feedback.

    We will bring this to the development team to investigate how we can improve our SOS feature. We treat an SOS as an emergency where it is preferable to double-handle, but empowering SOS responders to mark the incident as resolved, and improving reporting on SOS events are great suggestions.

    Thanks

    Karl

  4. When providing access to the Contractor Portal to third party users, it would be helpful to be able to enable a 2FA for additional security such as sms or email verification code alongside the password.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. We have employees who dont have a work email address and want them to be able to complete elearning induction. Being able to select an alternate email would be really useful in much the same way as members.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Employees  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Description: 06718300
    When creating an OnEvac event in the EVAC mobile app and selecting “On-site employees only” for SMS Verification, off-site employees are still included in the completion calculation. This causes reports to display incomplete or misleading percentages, even when all onsite employees and zones are verified.

    Problem to Solve:
    Currently, the only workaround is to manually verify off-site employees to reach 100 percent. For sites with multiple shifts and large employee numbers, this process is time-consuming and impractical during real emergencies. Customers need an automatic way to exclude off-site employees from the completion status so the percentage reflects only…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for your suggestion,

    The reason we notify all employees of an evacuation rather than just those marked 'on-site' is because often there is not perfect compliance - an employee may have forgotten to sign-in, or have signed-out but but not yet left the premises. However we agree that counting off site employees towards the total safe/not safe percentage can cause confusion. We will investigate further and open this up for votes.

    Thanks

    Karl

  7. Could be as simple as adding USPS as a visitor? or a daily updated "yes" or "no" in the "On-Site Insights" section? This would save many pointless trips to the mailroom, and lobby staff would probably appreciate not being questioned constantly.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Visitors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Description:
    Request to have a drop-down selection for employees and contractors. Users would start typing their name and see matching options appear. For contractors, the company they work for could be displayed; for employees, job title or home location could help differentiate between similar names.

    Current behavior is limited due to name visibility restrictions and privacy settings, similar to how visitor or contractor lists work when selecting a host.

    Suggested enhancements include:

    Reference: Navigate via the kiosk to View the list after entering 1–3 characters.

    In Advanced Settings, leverage employee/contractor list privacy controls to allow filtered dropdowns.

    Optionally, show a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Contractors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Summary / Issue:
    Currently, OnEvac reports can only be viewed via desktop for users with the Reports Manager role. During an evacuation, managers may not have access to a PC or desktop, making it difficult to quickly verify the safety status of employees, visitors, and contractors on-site. The existing mobile workaround (logging into OnLocation in desktop mode on a phone) is not practical or user-friendly in an emergency.

    Actual Result:
    Reports are only fully accessible on desktop. Mobile access is limited, and viewing detailed information requires a cumbersome desktop-mode login on a phone. Performance may be slow, and only the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Description:
    Large organisations often have employees with the same first name or full name, as well as many global roaming employees. Currently, visitors can select hosts who are not physically working at the site they are visiting, which can lead to incorrect host selection and access issues.

    Although adding job titles or other profile details can help differentiate employees, there are rare scenarios where two employees may share the same name and job title at the same location. In these cases, visitors may still accidentally select the wrong host.

    Problem:
    Visitors may accidentally select a random employee with a similar…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Visitors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Customers are requesting more control over the induction experience. Two enhancements are proposed:

    1. Making the “Getting Started” tutorial video optional (Induction Kiosk only).

    2. Allowing the completion message to be editable for all induction courses, regardless of whether they are completed on the Kiosk or online.

    Current Behaviour
    A. Induction Kiosk Only
    Before an induction begins, users must go through three mandatory steps:

    a.1. Check your Profile
    b.2. Check your Organization
    c.3. Getting Started Video – “Learn how it works”
    c.4. The video step cannot be disabled.

    B. All Induction Completion Flows (Kiosk + Online)

    Once a user completes an induction…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Inductions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. On several occasions, we have visitors/contractors who came onsite but didn't sign-in or forgot to do so, for whatever reason and was let in by staff.
    It wasn't good. It will be great if the onLocation system allow us to retroactively sign these people in after they have already here or have left site, if we know their details. This will allow us to at least have records of their present for future reference. Thanks.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Visitors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. In Triggers, we use this to send text messages to people who are still signed in. At one site, we have multiple zones, one of which is a Hostel that people stay at over night. It would be good to have more configuration options for the Triggers so that we can configure it to only send text messages to those outside of this zone.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Customers would like the ability to report on the most recent onsite activity at the organization level, not just by individual contractor records.

    Current Limitation:
    The People Presence Report can show the last sign-ins per individual, but there is no automated or direct way to determine the last activity date for a contractor organization as a whole.

    Why This Matters (Customer Value):
    Many organizations manage contractor relationships at the company level rather than individual worker level. The ability to track an organization’s most recent onsite activity would support:

    Contractor compliance monitoring (e.g., “Which approved vendors are still active?”)

    Contract review…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. There have been occasions contractors have logged into OnLocation and their badge has not been printed. Reprint would be such a great option rather than logging out and back in
    This option would also assist with contractors logging in on the GR Code away from the printer, or replacing damaged badges

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Badge Printing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Hi Team

    I have this request for deeper control from Matthew at Cummins. Could you consider the ability to turn on or off the ability for a Limited Certification Manager to add new certificates, as we have customers that use this feature, and giving the ability to turn on or off the option will give total control to the customer.

    Can we remove the ability of ‘Limited Certification Managers’ to add new certificates (limit user access or create a new user role)?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Classify Data in OnLocation

    An example below shows a customer requesting the ability to classify data in OnLocation. The next step after being able to classify information is to not allow an employee to run a report that includes data that has been tagged with any selected security classification.

    Example...
    Security Classification – Option to select one of: Public, Official, Sensitive, Protected

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Current Behavior:

    The PPR currently supports sorting by a single field only (e.g., Department or Full Name).

    When a user sorts Department A–Z, the Full Name order becomes randomized or is not retained.

    This behavior was confirmed as the intended functionality based on the 10/7/2025 release review — no changes were made to sorting logic at that time.

    Requested Enhancement:

    Add support for multi-level sorting in the People Presence Report.

    Example use case:

    User first sorts Department A–Z.

    Then sorts Full Name A–Z within each department group.

    Ideally, the UI would display a sort order indicator (e.g., “Primary sort: Department…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Description / Problem Statement:
    Customers managing a large number of sites often configure multiple triggers per location. At present, there is no way to generate, export, or print a consolidated list of triggers for each site. This makes it difficult for administrators to audit configurations, perform internal reviews, support compliance requirements, or share trigger setups with internal stakeholders who do not have direct access to the OnLocation platform.

    Current Limitation:
    Triggers can only be viewed individually within each site in the UI. There is no reporting, export, or print functionality that provides a site-level or organisation-level overview of all configured…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. It would be so helpful to add additional email addresses to "Send to this non-employee" for 'Notify the following people within our organization when insurance policies are due to expire' e.g. we have the email address of the direct contact at the Contractor company, however we would like to add the Contractors office/admin account to this field also, e.g employee.name@theirbusiness.com and office@theirbusiness.com to both be within this field.

    Same thing for the field on the same page, underneath within 'Nominate an internal email address where people must send the updates Insurance Policy Details to'. As our location in Sydney is…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Contractors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for your suggestion,

    Adding more flexibility around external notifications is on our radar. We will investigate further and in the mean-time open this up for votes form the community.

    Regards

    Karl

← Previous 1 3 4 5 8 9
  • Don't see your idea?