207 results found

1. Evacuation - OnEvac access through OnLocation API

   Once an evacuation is triggered with OnEvac, all API integration to OnEvac, so access control points can be configured, allowing employees and contractors to tap at the evacuation access point, and this automatically, through the API, sets them to "safe" in OnEvac.

   This request is asking for access to OnEvac through the API

   8 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Evacuation Management  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Ready for Votes  ·  anonymous responded

   Thanks Peter,

   We are planning a number of improvements to our APIs in our roadmap. I will leave this open for votes for now and update when this is scheduled.

   Thanks.

   Karl

2. Google Workspace Integration like Azzure

   Many customers use Google Workspace in place of Microsoft. These customers are asking for Google Workspace integration, like we have with Azure. The Google Workspace integration will update employees in OnLocation like Azure and also integrate Google Calendar. It will be interesting to see how many people out there are using Google Workspace and OnLocation.

   4 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Integrations and API  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Contractor Manager "Manager" Role to be able to Run Insurance Reports

   The ability for those with Contractor Manager "Manager" User Role to be able to run Insurance reports - currently only a Contractor Manager "Administrator" role is able to run insurance reports

   This feature would benefit our Contractor Managers greatly, as they would be able to run insurance reports for their respective sites without giving them access to a lot of Contractor Settings.

   7 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  User Roles  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Ready for Votes  ·  anonymous responded

   Hi Kathy,

   Thanks for you feedback. We will review permissions for Contractor Managers internally and open this up for votes from the community.

   Thanks

   Karl

4. Text/Email custom question

   What I am hoping to achieve is a workflow that sends a notification to our Reception inbox whenever a contractor provides or updates their email address during sign-in.
   Currently, the workflow rule is based on the following custom question:
   "Please enter your current email address"
   However, under Contractor - Custom Question Answer, the only available conditions are:
   • is the following
   • is not the following
   I cannot find any options such as:
   • is not empty
   • has value
   • contains text
   Could you please add additional condition for Contractor – Custom Question Answer that allows a trigger to determine whether a Text/Email custom question has a value / is not empty, and ideally whether the response has changed from the previous value.

   What I am hoping to achieve is a workflow that sends a notification to our Reception inbox whenever a contractor provides or updates their email address during sign-in.
   Currently, the workflow rule is based on the following custom question:
   "Please enter your current email address"
   However, under Contractor - Custom Question Answer, the only available conditions are:
   • is the following
   • is not the following
   I cannot find any options such as:
   • is not empty
   • has value
   • contains text
   Could you please add additional condition for Contractor – Custom Question Answer that allows a trigger to… more

   2 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Contractors  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Bulk email reminders

   Bulk Email Reminder Function for Contractor Compliance Renewals:

   We recommend implementing a bulk email reminder function that sends compliance renewal notifications to both the designated portal owner and the contractor's primary business email address. This will address a common industry issue where portal owners leave an organisation or fail to action renewal requests, resulting in expired insurances and certifications. By notifying multiple contacts within the contractor's business, compliance risks are reduced, renewal response rates improve, and contractor records remain current with less administrative intervention.

   Business Need
   A common issue across contractor management portals is that compliance documents (insurances, licences, certifications, inductions, etc.) expire because the designated portal owner has left the company, changed roles, or simply overlooked renewal notifications. This creates compliance risks and can result in contractors becoming non-compliant without management awareness.
   Proposed Enhancement
   Implement a bulk email reminder system that automatically sends compliance renewal notifications to both:

   Portal Owner/Primary Account Contact
   Main Contractor Business Email Address (generic company contact)

   Benefits

   Reduces missed insurance and certification renewals.
   Ensures notifications are still received when portal owners leave the organisation.
   Provides additional visibility to company management and administration teams.
   Improves contractor compliance rates.
   Reduces manual follow-up by administrators.
   Minimises contractor suspensions caused by expired documentation.

   Bulk Email Reminder Function for Contractor Compliance Renewals:

   We recommend implementing a bulk email reminder function that sends compliance renewal notifications to both the designated portal owner and the contractor's primary business email address. This will address a common industry issue where portal owners leave an organisation or fail to action renewal requests, resulting in expired insurances and certifications. By notifying multiple contacts within the contractor's business, compliance risks are reduced, renewal response rates improve, and contractor records remain current with less administrative intervention.

   Business Need
   A common issue across contractor management portals is that compliance documents (insurances, licences, certifications,… more

   4 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Certifications  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Configurable dashboards

   The ability to configure our own dashboards so that it shows one screen that displays everyone on site without the dashboard scrolling at all, and ability to configure it so that we can show the information we want.

   10 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Reporting and Dashboards  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Ready for Votes  ·  anonymous responded

   Hi Olivia,

   thanks for your suggestion.

   Improvements to dashboards are on our roadmap for 2026 so we will take this into consideration and leave it open for votes in the meanwhile.

   Thanks

7. Deputy Archive Employees

   Summary

   Deputy archived employee deactivation should apply to all matched employees, regardless of whether the employee record was originally created manually in OnLocation or imported from Deputy.

   Actual Result

   When the "Deactivate archived employees" setting is enabled in the Deputy integration:

   Employees originally imported from Deputy are automatically deactivated in OnLocation when archived in Deputy.
   Employees originally created manually in OnLocation and later matched to Deputy remain active in OnLocation after being archived in Deputy.
   This behavior is currently working as designed, with OnLocation treated as the source of truth for records that originated in OnLocation.
   Expected Result

   When a staff member is successfully matched between Deputy and OnLocation, the "Deactivate archived employees" setting should consistently deactivate the employee in OnLocation when they are archived in Deputy, regardless of where the employee record was originally created.

   Feedback / Business Reason

   The current behavior creates inconsistencies in employee lifecycle management and requires administrators to manually identify and deactivate archived employees that were originally created in OnLocation.

   Organizations using HRIS → Deputy → OnLocation workflows expect Deputy archive actions to be the authoritative employment status update once a user is matched through the integration. Having different deactivation behavior based on the employee's original source of creation is not intuitive and increases the risk of:

   Former employees remaining active in OnLocation.
   Administrative overhead from manual deactivation processes.
   Inconsistent access and workforce records across integrated systems.
   Missed deactivations, particularly for organizations managing large employee populations.

   Providing an option to extend deactivation syncing to all matched employees would improve consistency, reduce manual effort, and better align with customer expectations for automated employee lifecycle management across integrated platforms.

   Reference ticket:
   07242069

   Summary

   Deputy archived employee deactivation should apply to all matched employees, regardless of whether the employee record was originally created manually in OnLocation or imported from Deputy.

   Actual Result

   When the "Deactivate archived employees" setting is enabled in the Deputy integration:

   Employees originally imported from Deputy are automatically deactivated in OnLocation when archived in Deputy.
   Employees originally created manually in OnLocation and later matched to Deputy remain active in OnLocation after being archived in Deputy.
   This behavior is currently working as designed, with OnLocation treated as the source of truth for records that originated in OnLocation.
   Expected Result

   When a… more

   2 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Integrations and API  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Automatic Contractor Status Updates Based on 12-Month Inactivity

   Meridian Energy Limited | 328

   Requested Enhancement:
   Introduce a configurable automation feature that allows contractor Status to be automatically updated when they have not signed into a site over a 12-month period.

   Suggested Functionality:
   Automatic status change to Inactive

   4 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Contractors  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Ready for Votes  ·  anonymous responded

   Thanks Jonna,

   We will discuss this internally and open the request up for votes in the mean-time.

   Regards

   Karl

9. Support OnLocation Mobile Push Notifications for OnEvac Event Alerts

   Description:

   Currently, when an OnEvac event is started from the OnLocation Mobile app, emergency responders receive an SMS or email notification containing a link that opens the browser-based OnEvac interface.

   While this ensures all responders can access the event regardless of whether they have the OnLocation Mobile app installed, organisations that actively use the mobile app would like a more seamless experience.

   Customers have requested the ability for emergency responders who use the OnLocation Mobile app to receive a push notification (similar to the existing automatic sign-in notifications) that opens the event directly within the mobile app, while still retaining the existing SMS/email notification as a fallback.

   This would allow organisations to:

   Receive an instant push notification directly in the OnLocation Mobile app.
   Open and manage the active OnEvac event within the mobile app instead of the browser.
   Continue using the existing SMS/email notification with the browser link for responders who do not use the mobile app.
   Provide a more consistent and feature-rich experience for organisations that have adopted the OnLocation Mobile app for emergency response.

   Reference SF Ticket:
   07283172

   Description:

   Currently, when an OnEvac event is started from the OnLocation Mobile app, emergency responders receive an SMS or email notification containing a link that opens the browser-based OnEvac interface.

   While this ensures all responders can access the event regardless of whether they have the OnLocation Mobile app installed, organisations that actively use the mobile app would like a more seamless experience.

   Customers have requested the ability for emergency responders who use the OnLocation Mobile app to receive a push notification (similar to the existing automatic sign-in notifications) that opens the event directly within the mobile app, while still retaining… more

   2 votes

   vote vote vote vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Mobile Apps  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Department-Based Administration Permissions

    Summary

    Allow administration permissions to be assigned or restricted by Department in addition to the existing Location-based permissions.

    Current functionality

    OnLocation user roles determine what a user can and cannot do within the application. For many administration roles, access is then controlled by Location.

    The current permission model can therefore be understood as:

    User Role = what the user can do
    Location = where the user can do it

    For example, an Administrator can be assigned as either:

    Global – manage all locations in the account
    Limited – manage only the locations assigned to them

    A similar Global/Limited structure is used across a number of other roles, including Induction Manager, Reports Manager, Sign In/Out Manager, Triggers Manager, Identity Manager and OnPass Manager.

    Reference: Employee user roles explained — MRI OnLocation Help.

    Customer pain point

    This Location-based structure works well when a location represents the appropriate level of responsibility. However, some organisations have multiple departments operating within the same OnLocation location.

    For example, a single site may contain:

    Operations
    Maintenance
    HR
    Warehouse

    A manager may be responsible only for Operations, but if Operations and the other departments are all configured under the same OnLocation location, the current permission model does not provide a further Department-level restriction.

    As a result, assigning an administration role to that location may provide access more broadly than the manager actually requires.

    This can make it difficult for organisations to delegate administration to individual department managers while maintaining appropriate separation of access.

    Requested functionality

    Consider extending the existing Location-based permission model to support Department-level permissions where appropriate.

    The desired structure would be:

    User Role → Location → Department

    For example:

    Induction Manager → Main Site → Operations

    This would allow an organisation to give an Operations manager the appropriate administration role while restricting their access to the relevant department within the location.

    The intention is not to replace Location-based permissions, but to provide an additional level of granularity for organisations where Location is too broad a boundary for their operational structure.

    Reference: 07345540

    Summary

    Allow administration permissions to be assigned or restricted by Department in addition to the existing Location-based permissions.

    Current functionality

    OnLocation user roles determine what a user can and cannot do within the application. For many administration roles, access is then controlled by Location.

    The current permission model can therefore be understood as:

    User Role = what the user can do
    Location = where the user can do it

    For example, an Administrator can be assigned as either:

    Global – manage all locations in the account
    Limited – manage only the locations assigned to them

    A similar Global/Limited structure is… more

    1 vote

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  User Roles  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Change Insurance Status Filter to Multi Select

    On the Contractor Organization > Insurances screen, the Status filter is single select. It would be helpful to be able to select multiples. eg, show all Approved and Pending insurances, but hide Expired.

    This is not possible with the current setup.

    3 votes

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Contractors  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Option to Automatically Add Signed-In Employees as OnEvac Assistants

    Background
    Currently, OnEvac Assistants must be manually assigned and maintained. During an emergency, the availability of assistants can vary significantly depending on who is present on site at the time. This can result in too few assistants being available to support evacuation activities, particularly at larger sites or when designated assistants are absent.

    At the same time, designated site managers and evacuation leaders should retain their permanent OnEvac User permissions and responsibilities.

    Proposed Enhancement
    Introduce an organisation-level configuration option:

    ☐ Automatically add employees signed into site as OnEvac Assistants

    When enabled:

    All employees currently signed into a site are automatically granted OnEvac Assistant status for the duration of their site visit.
    Designated OnEvac Users (site managers, emergency coordinators, wardens, etc.) remain unchanged and retain their existing permissions.
    Temporary Assistant permissions are automatically removed when employees sign out of site.
    Contractors and visitors are excluded unless specifically configured by the organisation.

    Business Rationale

    Increases the number of available personnel who can assist during an evacuation.
    Reduces the administrative overhead of managing and updating assistant lists.
    Ensures assistant coverage reflects the personnel actually present on site.
    Improves resilience when designated assistants are absent, on leave, or working remotely.
    Supports faster accountability and evacuation management during emergency events.

    Expected Outcome During an evacuation, all employees currently signed into the site can assist with accountability activities and evacuation response, while designated site managers continue to lead the evacuation as permanent OnEvac Users.

    Suggested Configuration Setting

    Evacuation Settings

    ☑ Automatically add employees signed into site as OnEvac Assistants
    ☐ Include contractors

    This provides organisations with flexibility while ensuring emergency response capability scales automatically with site occupancy.

    Some sites may be staffed solely by contractors during certain periods. Providing the option to automatically grant OnEvac Assistant access to contractors who are signed into site would help ensure sufficient evacuation support and accountability coverage is available, regardless of whether those present are employees or contractors.

    Background
    Currently, OnEvac Assistants must be manually assigned and maintained. During an emergency, the availability of assistants can vary significantly depending on who is present on site at the time. This can result in too few assistants being available to support evacuation activities, particularly at larger sites or when designated assistants are absent.

    At the same time, designated site managers and evacuation leaders should retain their permanent OnEvac User permissions and responsibilities.

    Proposed Enhancement
    Introduce an organisation-level configuration option:

    ☐ Automatically add employees signed into site as OnEvac Assistants

    When enabled:

    All employees currently signed into a site are automatically… more

    2 votes

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Evacuation Management  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Tick Box for 'Are you safe' SMS for 'All Personnel On Site'

    When initiating an evacuation through the OnLocation OnEvac app, notification recipients can currently include employees, contractors and visitors regardless of whether they are physically on site at the time of the event. This can result in evacuation messages being sent to personnel who are working remotely, travelling, or located at another site.

    Proposed Enhancement
    Introduce an additional recipient selection option when sending evacuation notifications:

    All - Sends notifications to all personnel associated with the site, including those who are not currently signed in.

    All Personnel On Site - Sends notifications only to personnel who are actively signed into the site at the time the evacuation is initiated, including:

    Employees
    Contractors
    Visitors

    Business Rationale

    Improves the accuracy of evacuation communications.
    Reduces confusion for personnel who are not present on site.
    Ensures emergency notifications are targeted to those who may be at risk.
    Simplifies the evacuation process by providing a single selection rather than requiring manual filtering of personnel groups.
    Supports quicker decision-making during emergency situations where time is critical.

    Expected Outcome Emergency coordinators can select "All Personnel On Site" with confidence that evacuation messages will only be sent to individuals who are currently signed into the site, while still retaining the existing "All" option for situations where broader communication is required.

    When initiating an evacuation through the OnLocation OnEvac app, notification recipients can currently include employees, contractors and visitors regardless of whether they are physically on site at the time of the event. This can result in evacuation messages being sent to personnel who are working remotely, travelling, or located at another site.

    Proposed Enhancement
    Introduce an additional recipient selection option when sending evacuation notifications:

    All - Sends notifications to all personnel associated with the site, including those who are not currently signed in.

    All Personnel On Site - Sends notifications only to personnel who are actively signed into the site… more

    2 votes

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Evacuation Management  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Contractor Profile Status vs. Access Rules

    Problem:
    
    Contractor profiles remain marked as Active (green) even when requirements such as permitted dates, inductions, or other compliance checks have expired. While the system correctly denies sign‑in, the mismatch between the “Active” label and denied access causes confusion at the front desk.

    Replication:

    Create a contractor profile with permitted dates and induction requirements.

    Allow permitted dates or induction to expire.

    Attempt kiosk sign‑in → denied, but profile still shows Active.

    Current Design Logic:

    “Active” reflects that the contractor’s profile is still valid with their organization.

    Access is controlled separately by permitted dates, induction completion, and other profile rules.

    This separation allows administrators to renew dates or update inductions without resetting the entire account status.

    Impact:

    Department of Corrections manages ~3000 contractors/providers.

    Manual/bulk updates to set expired contractors to Inactive are not feasible at scale.

    Front desk staff are confused daily, impacting security compliance.

    Request:
    
    Introduce clearer visual indicators of the Contractor's Status if it's Active or other way to reword it, label, or other workaround. This would make the front desk view more intuitive and reduce confusion.

    Case Reference: #07207267

    Problem:
    
    Contractor profiles remain marked as Active (green) even when requirements such as permitted dates, inductions, or other compliance checks have expired. While the system correctly denies sign‑in, the mismatch between the “Active” label and denied access causes confusion at the front desk.

    Replication:

    Create a contractor profile with permitted dates and induction requirements.

    Allow permitted dates or induction to expire.

    Attempt kiosk sign‑in → denied, but profile still shows Active.

    Current Design Logic:

    “Active” reflects that the contractor’s profile is still valid with their organization.

    Access is controlled separately by permitted dates, induction completion, and other profile rules.

    This… more

    2 votes

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Contractors  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Allow Adding Notes to Manually Signed-In Visitors

    Summary

    Provide the ability for administrators or hosts to add notes/comments to visitor sign-in records when manually signing visitors in or out through the portal.

    Current Behavior

    When visitors are manually signed in through the portal, there is no dedicated field to record additional information such as actual arrival time, departure time, reason for manual entry, kiosk outage details, or other attendance-related notes.

    Requested Enhancement

    Allow users to add and retain notes against a visitor attendance record, either during sign-in/sign-out or by editing the visit record afterward.

    Customer Use Case

    The customer's kiosk experienced issues, preventing some visitors from signing in and out themselves.

    To maintain accurate records, staff manually created the visitor sign-in records through the portal. However, they were unable to record the visitors' actual arrival and departure times or document why the visit was entered manually.

    Customer Impact
    Loss of contextual information for manually managed visits.
    Reduced auditability of visitor records.
    Difficulty maintaining accurate attendance history during kiosk outages or operational disruptions.
    Additional reliance on external records or spreadsheets to capture visitor attendance details.
    Value of Enhancement

    Providing a notes field on visitor attendance records would:

    Improve audit and compliance tracking.
    Allow organizations to document exceptions and manual processes.
    Preserve important attendance information during kiosk or operational issues.
    Reduce the need for external tracking methods.
    Improve accuracy and transparency of visitor records.
    Example

    A kiosk is temporarily offline.

    Current:

    Visitor is manually signed in via the portal.
    No place exists to record that the visitor actually arrived at 8:07 AM and was entered manually due to a kiosk outage.

    Requested:

    Staff can add a note such as: "Visitor arrived at 8:07 AM. Record entered manually due to kiosk outage."

    Case number: 07406621

    Summary

    Provide the ability for administrators or hosts to add notes/comments to visitor sign-in records when manually signing visitors in or out through the portal.

    Current Behavior

    When visitors are manually signed in through the portal, there is no dedicated field to record additional information such as actual arrival time, departure time, reason for manual entry, kiosk outage details, or other attendance-related notes.

    Requested Enhancement

    Allow users to add and retain notes against a visitor attendance record, either during sign-in/sign-out or by editing the visit record afterward.

    Customer Use Case

    The customer's kiosk experienced issues, preventing some visitors from signing… more

    2 votes

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Visitors  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Allow Shared Visitor Records Across Users

    Summary

    Shared Visitor Directory for repeat visitors and contractors

    Current Behavior

    The My Visitors feature is user-specific. Visitors saved by one user can only be viewed and reused by that same user. Other users within the organization cannot access those saved visitor records.

    Requested Enhancement

    Provide a shared visitor directory that allows authorized users to access and reuse visitor records saved by other users within the organization.

    Customer Use Case

    Organizations frequently host the same contractors, clients, vendors, and repeat visitors across multiple sites and departments.

    Currently, each host must create and maintain their own copy of the same visitor record. For example, if one employee saves a contractor in My Visitors, another employee hosting that same contractor cannot reuse the existing record and must create it again.

    Customer Impact
    Duplicate visitor records are created across the organization.
    Increased administrative effort to maintain repeat visitor information.
    Risk of inconsistent visitor details between records.
    Additional time spent creating pre-registrations for recurring visitors.
    Value of Enhancement

    A shared visitor directory would:

    Reduce duplicate visitor records.
    Improve data consistency.
    Save time when pre-registering repeat visitors.
    Better support organizations with large contractor and visitor populations.
    Provide a more centralized visitor management experience.
    Example

    User A saves John Smith (Contractor).

    Today:

    User A can reuse the record.
    User B must create another John Smith record.

    Requested:

    User A and User B can both search for and reuse the same visitor record when creating pre-registrations within the Saved Visitors

    Case: 07344411

    Summary

    Shared Visitor Directory for repeat visitors and contractors

    Current Behavior

    The My Visitors feature is user-specific. Visitors saved by one user can only be viewed and reused by that same user. Other users within the organization cannot access those saved visitor records.

    Requested Enhancement

    Provide a shared visitor directory that allows authorized users to access and reuse visitor records saved by other users within the organization.

    Customer Use Case

    Organizations frequently host the same contractors, clients, vendors, and repeat visitors across multiple sites and departments.

    Currently, each host must create and maintain their own copy of the same visitor… more

    1 vote

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Visitors  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Read-Only Contractor Manager Role for Compliance

    User Role Enhancement – Read-Only Contractor Compliance Access
    Summary

    Introduce a new read-only Contractor Management permission or user role that allows users to view contractor information and compliance without the ability to edit or manage contractor records.

    Business Need

    Many organisations have Contractor Management User Roles (Global, limited, manager or coordinator), reception staff, security personnel, and compliance teams who only need to verify whether a contractor is compliant before granting site access.

    Currently, users must be assigned a Contractor Manager role (Administrator, Manager, or Coordinator) to access Contractor Management. However, all of these roles include the ability to make changes to contractor records within their permitted scope.

    There is no option to grant users view-only access.

    Proposed Enhancement

    Introduce a new permission or user role (for example, Contractor Viewer, Contractor Read-Only, or a similar permission under User Roles) that would allow users to:

    View contractor profiles.
    View contractor compliance status.
    View police clearances and certifications.
    View contractor organisations.
    Search and filter contractor records.
    View contractor history and reporting (where permitted).

    The role should not allow users to:

    Edit contractor or organisation details.
    Delete contractor profiles.
    Update or remove certifications or police clearances.
    Change contractor status or access.
    Assign Organisation Owners.
    Perform any administrative or management actions.
    Business Benefits

    This would allow organisations to separate operational visibility from administrative responsibility.

    Site Hosts and security personnel could quickly verify whether a contractor is approved to enter a site without being given permissions that allow them to modify contractor records.

    This would:

    Improve governance and security.
    Reduce the risk of accidental or unauthorised changes.
    Better support organisations with strict compliance and auditing requirements.
    Provide greater flexibility when assigning user permissions.
    Use Case

    Staff that needs this kind of Access or User Role only need to check whether contractors are compliant before allowing them access to site. At present, we must assign a Contractor Manager role, which also grants editing capabilities.

    A dedicated read-only permission or user role would allow staff to perform their day-to-day responsibilities while ensuring only authorised users can modify contractor information and compliance records.

    Reference Case:
    07289496

    User Role Enhancement – Read-Only Contractor Compliance Access
    Summary

    Introduce a new read-only Contractor Management permission or user role that allows users to view contractor information and compliance without the ability to edit or manage contractor records.

    Business Need

    Many organisations have Contractor Management User Roles (Global, limited, manager or coordinator), reception staff, security personnel, and compliance teams who only need to verify whether a contractor is compliant before granting site access.

    Currently, users must be assigned a Contractor Manager role (Administrator, Manager, or Coordinator) to access Contractor Management. However, all of these roles include the ability to make changes… more

    2 votes

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Contractors  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Induction Reporting in Contractor Portal

    Allow an admin the the contractor portal to view all members' expire/renew date for inductions. Currently, portal admins have to go into each member's profile to see when/if an induction course is expiring.

    1 vote

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Contractors  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Phone number field on the sign-in page appears to accept any number of digits, with no validation rules.

    I'd like to flag an issue with the phone number field on the sign-in page. It currently appears to accept any number of digits, with no minimum or maximum length or validation message to guide users. The asterisk indicates that the field is required, but there appear to be no other validation rules, allowing users to proceed with an incomplete phone number.

    I'm raising this to help improve data accuracy and the user experience.

    1 vote

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Visitors  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Sign In/Out Manager – Distinguish Home Location from Current Location

    Description:
    We’ve noticed some confusion in the Sign In/Out Manager regarding the Location field.

    Currently, the Location column appears to show the employee’s home/default location, even when they have signed in at a different location.

    For example, an employee may have a home location of Twizel Office but sign in at Wellington Office. In this case, the Location field can be misleading because it doesn’t appear to reflect where they have actually signed in.

    Suggested improvement:

    Rename the current “Location” field to “Home Location” to make it clear what it represents; and/or

    Add a separate “Current Location” field that shows the location where the employee actually signed in.

    This would make the information in the Sign In/Out Manager much clearer and help avoid confusion when employees sign in at locations other than their home location.

    SF: 07406965

    Description:
    We’ve noticed some confusion in the Sign In/Out Manager regarding the Location field.

    Currently, the Location column appears to show the employee’s home/default location, even when they have signed in at a different location.

    For example, an employee may have a home location of Twizel Office but sign in at Wellington Office. In this case, the Location field can be misleading because it doesn’t appear to reflect where they have actually signed in.

    Suggested improvement:

    Rename the current “Location” field to “Home Location” to make it clear what it represents; and/or

    Add a separate “Current Location” field that shows… more

    1 vote

    vote vote vote vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reporting and Dashboards  ·  Edit…  ·  delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Low Importance You must login first! Would Be Nice You must login first! We'd Love This! You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating