Skip to content

Settings and activity

14 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  OnLocation » Inductions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jenny Nabunat commented  · 

    Also to add if a selective notification feature within OnEvac — something like the “Send SMS to onsite only” or “Include all users” toggle, similar to how SMS Verification lets admins decide who receives messages. Hoping for flexibility:

    Site emergencies → onsite only

    Wider emergencies (storm, earthquake) → everyone in the organization. (Reference to: 06853633)

    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  OnLocation » Visitors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  OnLocation » Inductions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat shared this idea  · 
  12. 31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jenny Nabunat commented  · 

    06515627. See below their reply: "While most contractors we have are associated with a company we don't have an active list on OnLocation of all of our suppliers making this difficult to track or update - a simple second option other than visitor would be all it takes. "

    Jenny Nabunat supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jenny Nabunat commented  · 

    Hi Team,

    We have a customer who would like to suggest an enhancement to the Contractor sign-in process, aiming for the same level of flexibility currently available to Visitors.

    Current Limitation:
    In the current system, Contractors must be pre-associated with an existing organization in OnLocation before they can sign in and proceed to answer any basic or custom questions. This requires either:

    Adding the contractor to an existing organization, or

    Creating a new organization first, then linking the contractor.

    Suggested Enhancement:
    The customer would like the Contractor sign-in flow to function like the Visitor flow. Specifically, they’d like contractors to be able to:
    a. Enter their name
    b. Enter their company name (freely typed)
    c. Proceed directly to the relevant questions—without the company needing to be added in OnLocation

    Reason for the Request:

    This mirrors how the Visitor workflow currently operates, which they find ideal.

    They work with many contractors but do not maintain an active or complete list of all contractor organizations in OnLocation.

    Manually registering every contractor’s company creates unnecessary overhead and undermines efficiency.

    Even just a second option in the sign-in process—separate from Visitor—if that is applicable.

  13. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat supported this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenny Nabunat supported this idea  ·