Settings and activity
20 results found
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
can make one date for charging fees especially for when wanting to send daily statements would not have to worry about missing fees or overcharging as would be just charged on a date
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this will also ensure that people working on the one database do not cross over into the incorrect database
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
Would be nice to be able to add this to templates
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
Commerical need different communication to residential so would be good to be able to set up separate
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
save time when needing to do the process
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
avoid any fees being charged before new lease commences
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
Streamline Accounts
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
.
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this will save having to scroll through the entire list to identify any missing payment details to the top of the screen
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
make job easier with one click to get all inspections set
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Helen Rolfe
commented
this would be a great function to have
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
-
324 votes
Hi User Voice Supporters! We're currently setting requirements with the development team for Failed Communication Notifications and are after some feedback to ensure we get the right notifications to you and your team.
Would you prefer, an In-App (in Property Tree) notification, that alerted you each time a communication failed?
Or, would you prefer to receive an email each time a communication failed? (similar to an outlook or gmail bounce-back).
In the case of receiving an email, if you are using the Communication Platform where your email replies are received into Property Tree, would you prefer this failed email notification to be received into the Communication Platform inbox, assigned to you (or the company, if the email was sent from the company)? Or would you prefer this email to be sent to your external email each time an email failed to send? If you are not using the Communication Platform,…
Helen Rolfe
supported this idea
·
this will allow you to ensure that the fee is only charged once and no double up because of a process being completed